Why is there condemnation of Irans treatment of the 15 British prisoners? - torture female prisoners rapidshare
If Beinder treated better than U.S. prisoners held at Guantanamo. The text of The Guardian speaks of the woman caught Brit part of what I'm talking about
Liquids "His teammates are not tied, blindfolded, denied, in excruciating physical contortions for long periods or, and are forced to eat. If we had not spit the Bible urinating or torn from their faces. You do not have electrodes to their genitals set fixed or fighting dogs.
They were not hanging from a forklift truck and photographed for the entertainment of their captors. They were not pictured naked and smeared in their own excrement. They were in a plane rented by the CIA and secretly "chartered" t groupsBasement or the prison in a country where torturers experienced and free to do its worst "
So why hypocites the use of torture be justified by the United States condemned Iran?
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Torture Female Prisoners Rapidshare Why Is There Condemnation Of Irans Treatment Of The 15 British Prisoners?
7 comments:
Have not heard much negative about how they were treated. The condemnation comes from:
1) Do not let 3rd-party or consular access to them
2) Put the hole cards on TV
3) a list of the images on television
4) an international border crossing to take prisoners / hostages.
All this is contrary to the Geneva Convention and international law.
This action in Iran is a mistake, and that is why he is condemed. The attempt to justify that the mistakes of others is simply foolish.
We do not know the truth. There are many questions about the prisoners, among them were forced to say what he said.
How often do you have to Guantanamo and Iran are taken for this decision?
Note that the UK provides evidence that it has been in Iraqi waters, and they (the hostages released) at the time, "admitted" that were in Iranian waters ...... Kinda raises the question what he has to admit something is not that obvious. You have come to have a very humane treatment that you mentioned, and Iran is so well known.
Simple answer.
Non-US-UK forces.
Guantanamo has nothing to do with our soldiers taken hostage by Iran to do.
If they are held as prisoners of war, then there are rules of conduct. To see on television "apology" and the letters of exit "apparently" that illuminates written by them, do not.
1) The prisoners that we are terrorists, the Iranians of the British propaganda that suck through a straw innocent.
2) Torture is wrong, if we do not, someone else, and the Americans have been punished.
3) You're a lame window to compare Iran with the United States.
Sean
I think your point is valid for the simple reason that the proposition that Iran has taken British prison service (I know, that is, demand) in Iraqi waters - not Iranian waters.
It is therefore not so much as it does with prisoners, but the fact they were first adopted.
Moreover, they are forced to say the statements of condemnation against the United Kingdom and the United States problem and needs, they are guilty.
What I see are the AK47 says off camera.
I do not condemn or agree) with illegal treatment (of the Geneva Convention, prisoners of a group with you on these points do not agree.
I assume you are a PIO for Iran.
Post a Comment